An Objection to Nakayama Namiki
I will describe the criticism of the solution to the declining population of Nakayama Namiki.
First of all, the author said that the problem of declining marriage rate in Japan and the fact that fewer people to nurture children are problems, and it seems that the solution is to enrich marriage "marriage" . I also think that it is a very good idea to increase the place for encounters by pointing the government. However, his sentences do not include warranties after marriage. I will write about it there in the form of criticism this time.
First of all, increasing the number of marriages is easy, but as you increase the number of children, the point is that the story will change a bit. According to the survey of private insurance companies, there are statistical data that it takes about 30 million yen in about 22 years until college graduation to raise one child. In other words, it costs about 30 million yen if you give birth to a child. Considering that it will increase the population, it is important that two or more people in a family need more money, that is, about 60 million yen or more. While I did not consider this, I mentioned that it would be better to raise the marriage rate and increase the number of children, but I think that there are many families that children can not afford even if they want it.
So I think that the government should tackle social security systems to increase marriage rate and birthrate. Specifically, as it is still present, it is thought that raising the payment amount of the system such as child allowance, increasing nursery school and improving nursery school and childcare leave system are effective for fertility rate as well. In addition, considering advancing to the university, it is considered important to enhance the scholarship system. Currently I am living a life with my life as a scholarship. Therefore, I would like you to work on improving this scholarship system as soon as possible. Specifically, I think that it would be better to enhance the scholarship of benefits rather than the loan system. It must be returned in the loan type, and the burden is also great. I think that the Japanese government imitates such a place because I think that the benefit type is a system that is more abroad.
This concludes criticism of Nakayama Nammiki.
Thank you for reading.
First of all, the author said that the problem of declining marriage rate in Japan and the fact that fewer people to nurture children are problems, and it seems that the solution is to enrich marriage "marriage" . I also think that it is a very good idea to increase the place for encounters by pointing the government. However, his sentences do not include warranties after marriage. I will write about it there in the form of criticism this time.
First of all, increasing the number of marriages is easy, but as you increase the number of children, the point is that the story will change a bit. According to the survey of private insurance companies, there are statistical data that it takes about 30 million yen in about 22 years until college graduation to raise one child. In other words, it costs about 30 million yen if you give birth to a child. Considering that it will increase the population, it is important that two or more people in a family need more money, that is, about 60 million yen or more. While I did not consider this, I mentioned that it would be better to raise the marriage rate and increase the number of children, but I think that there are many families that children can not afford even if they want it.
So I think that the government should tackle social security systems to increase marriage rate and birthrate. Specifically, as it is still present, it is thought that raising the payment amount of the system such as child allowance, increasing nursery school and improving nursery school and childcare leave system are effective for fertility rate as well. In addition, considering advancing to the university, it is considered important to enhance the scholarship system. Currently I am living a life with my life as a scholarship. Therefore, I would like you to work on improving this scholarship system as soon as possible. Specifically, I think that it would be better to enhance the scholarship of benefits rather than the loan system. It must be returned in the loan type, and the burden is also great. I think that the Japanese government imitates such a place because I think that the benefit type is a system that is more abroad.
This concludes criticism of Nakayama Nammiki.
Thank you for reading.